On 2011-04-01, at 8:38 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:

> On 1 April 2011 at 11:15, Davor Cubranic wrote:
> | On 2011-03-31, at 8:12 PM, Sean Robert McGuffee wrote:
> | 
> | > Thanks for the info about modularity. I'll definitely be wikipedia'ing 
> that.
> | > Also, thanks for clarifying the package author thing--I literally was
> | > imagining some sort of function that writes something related to packages.
> | 
> | You know, I can see that, esp. in the context of the rest of that section. 
> I'll send a suggestion to the manual maintainers to consider using a clearer 
> expression.
> 
> Thanks for doing that on r-devel!  Much appreciated.

As you saw, there was a bit of feedback, both positive and negative, but 
nothing from the core team. So I've no idea whether this will go anywhere or 
not. If you know who would be the right person to talk to, I don't mind also 
emailing them directly to solicit their opinion on the matter.

Davor
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel

Reply via email to