It's Romain's trick, really, as you can see from the thread Dirk mentioned. I was just the first to use it in a CRAN package.
Davor On 2011-05-15, at 7:04 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 15 May 2011 at 01:43, Christian Gunning wrote: > | On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 6:46 PM, > | <rcpp-devel-requ...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at> wrote: > | > > | > There is also Davor's trick of getting the C++ function pointer---this > avoids > | > the 'going back to R' overhead. But it is not really clean to call an API > | > that way if the API decided to close off those access points... > | > | Eh? Haven't seen that before -- where does it live? Let's doc it if it's > sane... > > As I wrote _in the very next paragraph_ of the email you quote from ;-) : > > -- Package rgam on CRAN is one place > > -- previous mails here as e.g. Romain's second post in the this thread > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.rcpp/408 > > Dirk > > -- > Gauss once played himself in a zero-sum game and won $50. > -- #11 at http://www.gaussfacts.com > _______________________________________________ > Rcpp-devel mailing list > Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org > https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
