On 31.05.2011 21:44 (UTC+1), Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 31 May 2011 at 09:27, Rainer Hurling wrote: | Dirk, sorry again for my misunderstanding. No worries. I do appreciate how you (pretty much single-handedly) try to keep R and its packages viable on your chosen platform.
That's nice circumscribed for a bundle of packages we have to use at work ;-)
From my point of view the very most work with R on FreeBSD is done by Brendan Fabeny (b.f.) and he does a great job.
| Yes, I also think that | FreeBSD people could live with this patch. The patch currently says (and I now include the forward-looking comment :) /* TODO: we might need to undef this on other platforms as well */ #if defined(__GNUC__)&& defined(_WIN64) || defined(__FreeBSD__) #undef ARMA_HAVE_STD_SNPRINTF #endif Would we need additional defines for NetBSD and/or OpenBSD?
I am afraid that I do not have any knowledge about it. (If it would be needed the preprocessor defines should be __OpenBSD__ and __NetBSD__, but this is well known, isn't it?)
Rainer
Dirk
_______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
