Hi Conrad, all, Thanks for the fixes and fast release. I have just tested RcppArmadillo_0.2.22 on my code and it works fine.
Best regards, baptiste On 7 June 2011 03:52, Conrad Sand <conradsand.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Baptise & Terrance, > > I've fixed several issues in Armadillo and released an updated version > (1.99.4). Dirk has wrapped it up in RcppArmadillo 0.2.22, which > should be hitting the mirrors soon. > > Could you try your code again and let me know if you encounter any problems ? > > With regards, > Conrad > > > On 1 June 2011 05:58, baptiste auguie <baptiste.aug...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Thanks so much, Conrad! >> >> Best regards, >> >> Baptiste >> >> On 31 May 2011 23:37, Conrad Sand wrote: >>> I've found the cause of the issue (involves handling of small matrices). >>> >>> The fix is easy (and already done in the SVN repo), but I currently >>> don't have the time to roll out another release. I'll aim to release >>> a fix on the weekend, which will also give me time to double-check if >>> there is a problem in inv(). >>> >>> In the meantime I recommend sticking to the previous version of >>> Armadillo and RcppArmadillo. >>> >>> btw, for dot products I recommend using the dot() and cdot() functions >>> -- they're generally faster than going through the multiplication >>> operator. > _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
