>
> | We usually do
> |
> | Rcpp::List ret = Rcpp::List::create(Rcpp::Named("pa", pa),
> | Rcpp::Named("w", w);
> | Rcpp::Named("xa", xa));
> | return ret;
> |
> | to avoid re-allocation. But that is minuscule, and your code is
> arguably
> | as easy or easier to read :)
> |
> |
> | Did I understand correctly that your proposal is to create return object
> all in
> | one spot to avoid changing it as I did three times?
>
> Yup!
Just a note. I see a little speedup using your return suggestion so once
again for this!
gg
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
