On November 6, 2011 07:32:44 AM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > This is blown way out of proportion. As I said, the behaviour is > documented, and the corner case gets mentioned in all our talks too (see > the Google Tech Talk video for example).
I agree with Dirk. Modifying Rcpp arguments in-place is not a beginner-level trick, so if you're writing code that does that kind of stuff, better check the type of the SEXP being passed in first and don't be surprised by implicit type conversions. As the old saying goes, "If you want to play with the big dogs, ..." Davor _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
