Problem solved by upgrading RcppArmadillo and Rcpp! Yeah!
Thanks for your help, Katherine On 2/27/12 5:40 PM, "Dirk Eddelbuettel" <e...@debian.org> wrote: > >Hi Katherine, > >Thanks for posting here. > >On 27 February 2012 at 17:23, Comanor, Katherine wrote: >| Hello Dirk, >| >| I went through the thread at: >http://www.digipedia.pl/usenet/thread/14655/781/ >| as I seem to be running into the same problem, but wasn't able to >determine a >| possible solution. >| >| Basically, I'm trying to build R's RcppArmadillo, and although the >build does >| succeed, it has undefined symbols in the binary library file >RcppAramdillo.so >| which causes R's Forecast library, which depends on RcppArmadillo, not >to build > >On OS X with g++ 4.2.1, I suspect? > >| as a result of these undefined symbols. I'm trying to build Forecast >3.16 >| using RcppArmadillo 0.2.34 and Rcpp 0.9.9. >| >| Here are the undefined symbols dealing with "version": >| >| nm RcppArmadillo.so| grep -i version >| 000000000001022e t _GLOBAL__I_armadillo_version >| U _ZN4arma12arma_version5majorE >| U _ZN4arma12arma_version5minorE >| U _ZN4arma12arma_version5patchE > >It is a known issue that confused us a little--and we don;t really run >this >platform--but thankfully Gershon Bialer sent us a patch. From ChangeLog: > > 2011-12-29 Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> > > * src/RcppArmadillo.cpp: Force instantiation of arma version vars > which helps with older OS X compiler, as suggested by Gershon Bialer > >and this is now in RcppArmadillo 0.2.35. Please try that, which itself >will >need Rcpp 0.9.10. > >Let us know how it goes. > >Cheers, Dirk > > >-- >"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is >too >dark to read." -- Groucho Marx _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
