> I think what Peng meant as an alternative to Runit is not the devtools > itself, but testthat. See > http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/testthat/ and > https://github.com/hadley/test_that > > Philosophically, testthat draws on Ruby test frameworks like rspec and > other BDD tools.
Thanks! I did briefly consider testthat, based on reading [1], and dismissed it because it seemed to be different without being better. (I'm not saying it was worse, just it didn't appear to have any killer reason to make it worth turning my back on the 10-15 years worth of experience the software industry has with the xUnit approach.) Darren [1]: http://www.johnmyleswhite.com/notebook/2010/08/17/unit-testing-in-r-the-bare-minimum/ -- Darren Cook, Software Researcher/Developer http://dcook.org/work/ (About me and my work) http://dcook.org/blogs.html (My blogs and articles) _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
