> I agree that we might want to have these things in a package say RcppBase. > Then Rcpp can remain the R to cpp layer. And anybody who want to implement > an R base function in cpp, can contribute it to RcppBase.
Sounds like a good idea, except for the naming (which makes it sound like the Rcpp base class) :-) Darren _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
