> But still, I don't understand why you consider pmin and pmax as primitives?
>
> Even if they are part of the base package it's not right to consider them as
> primitive of the R language!
>
> You can check:
> .Primitive('pmax')Well, they're implemented in C code. I don't think R has a good definition of what a "primitive" of the language is - primitive and internal functions are interspersed functions in names.c, and there's no formal spec defining which functions are primitive. Hadley -- RStudio / Rice University http://had.co.nz/ _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
