On 11 March 2013 at 15:55, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 11 March 2013 at 13:39, Christian Gunning wrote:
| | > I don't like add-ons/ all that much as it doesn't show (Rcpp)Armadillo.
| | > How about any one of these:
| | >
| | > inst/include/RcppArmadilloXtra/sample.h
| | > inst/include/RcppArmadillo/extra/sample.h
| | > inst/include/RcppArmadillo/add-on/sample.h
| | > inst/include/RcppArmadillo/extensions/sample.h
| | > inst/include/RcppArmadillo/apps/sample.h
| | > inst/include/RcppArmadillo/applications/sample.h
| | > [...]
| |
| | I vote for "extensions".
|
| I like that too. And makes it clearer why we keep it out of RcppArmadillo.h
| (to keep the core smaller, have it build faster, ... etc)
Sorry, and just to be plain, that still would need another layer of
'RcppArmadillo' because if we did, say,
(inst)/include/RcppArmadillo/extensions/sample.h
then the include is still just
#include <extensions/sample.h>
which is not expressive enough. I think we should go for something like boost
where we have to do
#include <RcppArmadillo/extensions/sample.h>
but that would require a directory
(inst)/include/RcppArmadillo/RcppArmadillo/extensions/sample.h
which reads silly. Hm.
Better suggestions, anyone?
Dirk
--
Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
