Hello, Thanks for you quick answer (again!). After some research, I found the functions : Mapply_2, and Mapply_3. I'll have a look how it works.
I haven't understood the second proposition but if the first one works it's fine. Have a nice evening, J. Le vendredi, 10 mai 2013 à 17:47, Romain Francois a écrit : > Iirc we have mapply2 and mapply3. > > Otherwise you can make Foo a helper class instead of a function. And you > embed the 3 variables in your class. > > > > Le 10 mai 2013 à 17:40, Julien Duvanel <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> a écrit : > > > Hello again, > > > > I hope I don't disturb you too much. I have again a small question. I > > haven't seen the answer on your vignette, maybe this is not possible. > > Here's what I would like to do : > > > > double Foo(double x, double a1, double a2) { > > return f(x,a1,a2); > > } > > > > NumericVector myVec; > > > > sapply(myVec, Foo( ……, a1, a2)); // This is the line not working > > > > In every example I saw, Foo (in the example, it's sometimes square) could > > only have one parameter (and in my case I have many parameters). > > > > Is it possible ? Am I missing something ? > > > > Thank you very much (again) for your time, > > > > Have a nice evening/week-end, > > > > Julien > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Rcpp-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > (mailto:[email protected]) > > https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
_______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
