On 19 June 2013 at 16:07, Romain Francois wrote: | We were waiting for the book release to bump up to 1.0.0 right ?
Not really. | Rcpp is mature enough now to deserve a 1.0.0. Maybe. Maybe not. I think I learn towards 'not'. | But for something like this, removing code that is very unlikely used, I | would have liked us to be more reactive. And I want a pony. Did you mean 'proactive' here? And yes, we all want a pony. Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
