Romain, On 11 October 2013 at 13:03, Romain Francois wrote: | Anyway, I'd like to propose adding Shield, Armor and Shleter to Rcpp.
Sure. | This is a non disruptive proposal as the template classes I propose | don't interract with the rest of the code. We might not use them in | Rcpp, but we should. There are currently 155 calls to UNPROTECT in the | .h and .cpp of Rcpp. That is that many macro calls we could get rid of. (UN)PROTECT calls in code internal to Rcpp are less of a worry (at least on the user list); another question is how often Rcpp users need to resort to this in their code, and how often it would help? I don't have a good idea. And OTOH as this seems to non-disruptive and orthogonal to existing code, why not? And the names are very cute indeed. I'd say go for it. Thanks, Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
