Dirk, Thank you for prompt reply. I did try the -std=c++11 flag but it was not valid for my g++ version. Of course I never bothered with -std=c++0x which built the SVN version just fine!
With that said, I will follow your advice and stick with the CRAN version for now; it built for me without any special flags. I would be happy to contribute, but I confess I am not much of an expert on Rcpp and Boost, I am just learning! But perhaps a good exercise would be to examine what work you have done to expand the SVN version and continue with that, we shall see. Anyway, thank you I am all set now! Dino On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > > Dino, > > Also, if you want another example of 'long long int': RcppCNPy needs to > enable -std=c++11 to the 'long long int' beheaviour to support int64 as > needed in the NumPy headers for ints. > > If -std=c++11 is not enable, RcppCNPy does not support integers, otherwise it > does. You could building that locally and check the changed behaviour (and > you get by without the Boost dependency; another thing to update for RcppBDT > by switching to package BH). > > Regards, Dirk > > -- > Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
