As a user of Rcpp, with an interest in using R and C++ together, I would prefer 
that we have this discussion without rancor.

I'm subscribing to both lists because

* Rcpp works for me. I haven't upgraded since I don't want the hassle until the 
end of the year.
* Other ideas may work better.

I do have something that works well for me, as I'm able to compile my code in 
Visual Studio and also inside an R package with Rcpp and run tests of C++ 
implementations against R implementations. I use the R implementations to 
generate test cases for the Visual Studio hosted code. I'm pretty committed to 
Rcpp at this point.

I'm reluctant to change anything unless I see a clear benefit since making big 
changes is time away from my real work. I'll be following discussions on both 
lists as best as I can.

Thanks,
Dale Smith, Ph.D.
Senior Financial Quantitative Analyst
Financial & Risk Management Solutions
Fiserv
Office: 678-375-5315
www.fiserv.com

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Romain François
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 4:56 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Rcpp-devel] Generic R and C++ discussion

Hello, 

I have created a new mailing list (as a google group) for general discussions 
about R and C++. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/r-and-cpp

Shame that it had to come to this, but apparently Rcpp-devel is only for 
discussing the Dirk approved implementation of Rcpp. 

Personally, I will keep watching Rcpp-devel, and I hope I can still contribute 
interesting answers here, but I will use the google group for broad 
discussions. 

Romain
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel

Reply via email to