On 3 December 2014 at 11:14, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | This is known, documented / has been discussed before, and hard to change now | given that 100 CRAN packages depend on RcppArmadillo and its existing interface. | | You could write your own converter to SEXP and use that.
That said, I am no big fan either of the current behaviour you singled out. Maybe we could plan for a change, add a loud warning in X months and then phase out the current behaviour in Y months with Y >= 2 * X. So if someone wants to propose a plan, I am sure a few of us would review it.. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
