Please find my patch attached. I hope someone will make another (and better) one using more meaningful typecasts than the ones I used.
Yes, " we are all working professionals, researchers or academics" Thanks for your time, Latchezar -----Original Message----- From: Dirk Eddelbuettel [mailto:e...@debian.org] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 1:33 PM To: Latchezar (Lucho) Dimitrov Cc: Dirk Eddelbuettel; Kevin Ushey; rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org Subject: RE: [Rcpp-devel] FW: Rcpp attributes.cpp issue On 20 April 2015 at 17:08, Latchezar (Lucho) Dimitrov wrote: | What is the way to "send a proper patch for" you all "to review" Sorry | for asking but it is not obvious on the list Rcpp code is on GiHub as even a casual Google query would reveal. How to contribute via GitHub is explained in numerous tutorials. If all that is too much or too newfangled, you can work off source releases and create a patch. If that is too much then ... you may want to refresh what you know about open source code development during the last thirty years. You contributions are welcome here. But we are all working professionals, researchers or academics so it helps us a great deal if you follow standard conventions. So yes, "reproducible examples" and the somewhat common standard format for code contributions. Thanks, Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
patch
Description: patch
_______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
