Thanks for the hints and help. This is good news, since the work with Rcpp modules is very easy. Yet, meanwhile I managed to make it work using RcppExports (with the wrapper from the skeleton example). Works charmingly.
Sören > On 04.05.2015, at 15:35, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On 3 May 2015 at 20:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | Not to sound too flippant but if code and doc are amiss, you could fix > either > | the doc side, or the code side: > | > | i) don't document in Rd > | > | ii) export myfun() by adding // [[Rcpp::export]] above it > | > | There is simply no formal connection between Modules and Rd files. > > Forgot to add that there is hope. > > RcppR6 by Rich (CC'ed) is the single most credible alternative to using > Modules, and it "simply" (there is a bit of pre-processing machinery) > converts into using Attributes. So at that point your documentation is > simply the same as for normal functions. > > RcppR6 is not on CRAN yet so we all need to shame Rich into getting it there. > > Dirk > > -- > http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org > _______________________________________________ > Rcpp-devel mailing list > Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org > https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel