On 30 August 2015 at 16:39, Daniel McCarthy wrote:
| Thank you Dirk!
|
| The issue stemmed from my using RcppArmadillo's sample function. Reference
| link here:
| http://gallery.rcpp.org/articles/using-the-Rcpp-based-sample-implementation/
|
| At the top of my .cpp file I had used the following code to be able to call
| upon that function:
|
| #include <armadillo>
| #include <RcppArmadilloExtensions/sample.h>
| //[[Rcpp::depends(RcppArmadillo)]]
|
|
| After I created another function that avoided my needing to call upon the
| function that required this, then going back to putting the usual stuff at the
| top of my .cpp file,
|
| #include <RcppArmadillo.h>
| //[[Rcpp::depends(RcppArmadillo)]]
|
|
| the note went away.
Look more closely. I suspect the issue was likely caused you including
#include <armadillo>
without also including our settings. So you get vanilla Armadillo -- without
our override. If you did
#include <RcppArmadillo.h>
#include <RcppArmadilloExtensions/sample.h>
// [[Rcpp::depends(RcppArmadillo)]]
I am fairly certain you would RcppArmadillo AND the desired sample() function
BUT NOT the dreaded cout.
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
