Peter,
You can refer to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/cxx0x_status.html to see what
features are supported in gcc4.6.
Best,
--
Hao Ye
h...@ucsd.edu
> On Jan 27, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Peter Meissner <retep.meiss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you all so much for your suggestions.
>
> What features I needed to get working where auto type in combination
> with cycling through multimap.equal_range() results. It seems like
> this was not actually a problem with Windows / Rtools / compiler /
> c++0x / c++11 but with not cleaning up before recompiling - now I feel
> stupid, thanks again for clearifications and pointing in the right
> direction. It works.
>
> Best, Peter
>
>
> PS.:
>
> To be complete here is what I attempt to do, that actually works even
> with the g++4.6.3 compiler and c++0x standard under Windows (i.e.
> merging two data.frames via time span information by expanding time
> spans to days and than cycling through the days and looking up matches
> in multimaps to build a new data.frame with day, id1, and id2 that can
> ultimatly be re-aggregated to spans):
>
> #include <iostream>
> #include <vector>
> #include <Rcpp.h>
> using namespace Rcpp;
> using namespace std;
>
> // [[Rcpp::plugins(cpp11)]]
> // [[Rcpp::export]]
>
> DataFrame span_matcher_worker(DataFrame df1, DataFrame df2) {
>
> // put info in neat litle vectors
> CharacterVector id_one_in = df1[0];
> IntegerVector start_one_in = df1[1];
> IntegerVector end_one_in = df1[2];
>
>
> CharacterVector id_two_in = df2[0];
> IntegerVector start_two_in = df2[1];
> IntegerVector end_two_in = df2[2];
>
> // determine span length
> int min_start_one = min(start_one_in);
> int min_start_two = min(start_two_in);
>
> int max_end_one = max(end_one_in);
> int max_end_two = max(end_two_in);
>
> int min_span = min(min_start_one, min_start_two) ;
> int max_span = max(max_end_one, max_end_two);
>
> // put days:ids into multimap
> multimap<int, string> days_id_one;
> multimap<int, string> days_id_two;
>
> for( int i = 0; i < id_one_in.size(); i++ ){
> for (int day = start_one_in[i]; day <= end_one_in[i]; day++ ){
> days_id_one.insert(pair<int, string>(day,
> as<string>(id_one_in[i]) ));
> }
> }
>
> for( int i = 0; i < id_two_in.size(); i++ ){
> for (int day = start_two_in[i]; day <= end_two_in[i]; day++ ){
> days_id_two.insert(pair<int, string>(day,
> as<string>(id_two_in[i])));
> }
> }
>
>
> // access the columns
> IntegerVector days;
> CharacterVector id_one ;
> CharacterVector id_two ;
>
> for (int i = min_span; i <= max_span; i++) {
> // no matches
> if( days_id_one.count(i)==0 && days_id_two.count(i)==0 ){
> days.push_back(i);
> id_one.push_back(NA_STRING);
> id_two.push_back(NA_STRING);
> continue;
> }
> // matches for one but not for two
> if( days_id_one.count(i)>0 && days_id_two.count(i)==0 ){
> auto range = days_id_one.equal_range(i);
> for (auto iterate = range.first; iterate != range.second;
> ++iterate) {
> days.push_back(i);
> id_one.push_back(iterate->second);
> id_two.push_back(NA_STRING);
> }
> continue;
> }
> // matches for two but not for one
> if( days_id_one.count(i)==0 && days_id_two.count(i)>0 ){
> auto range = days_id_two.equal_range(i);
> for (auto iterate = range.first; iterate != range.second;
> ++iterate) {
> days.push_back(i);
> id_one.push_back(NA_STRING);
> id_two.push_back(iterate->second);
> }
> continue;
> }
> // matches in both
> if( days_id_one.count(i)>0 && days_id_two.count(i)>0 ){
> auto range = days_id_one.equal_range(i);
> for (auto it = range.first; it != range.second; it++) {
> auto range_two = days_id_two.equal_range(i);
> for (auto it_two = range_two.first; it_two !=
> range_two.second; it_two++) {
> days.push_back(i);
> id_one.push_back(it->second);
> id_two.push_back(it_two->second);
> }
> }
> }
> };
>
> // return a new data frame
> return DataFrame::create(
> _["days"]=days,
> _["id_one"]=id_one,
> _["id_two"]=id_two)
> ;
> }
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Am Mi, 27. Jan, 2016 um 1:57 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org>:
>>
>> On 27 January 2016 at 11:13, Martyn Plummer wrote:
>> | Q1: Does CRAN accept C++11 code?
>> | A1: Yes but you have to indicate that you are using C++11 rather
>> than C
>> | ++98, which is still the default standard for CRAN packages. This is
>> | described in the "Writing R Extensions" manual in section 1.2.4.
>>
>> Yup. Declaring it is easy. And the consequence _can_ (for now) be
>> that you
>> may not be able to build on Windows. The g++ 4.6.* compilers supports
>> a
>> subset of C++11 only.
>>
>> I declare 'CXX_STD = CXX11' in packages RcppAnnoy, RcppBDT, RcppCCTZ,
>> RcppCNPy, RcppTOML -- and of these RcppAnnoy, RcppBDT and RcppCNPy
>> *do*
>> create Windows binaries. Whereas RcppCCTZ and RcppTOML use 'real'
>> C++11 with
>> features not supported by this old compiler so they exist on Linux
>> and OS X
>> only.
>>
>> | Q2: Are C++11 features available on Windows?
>> | A2: Not yet. Release 4.6.3 includes limited support for C++11
>> features.
>> | Again, the "Writing R Extensions" manual will give you more details,
>> | with a link to a page describing what features are available. There
>> are
>> | plans to update the toolchain on Windows to 4.9.2. This will
>> improve C
>> | ++11 support on windows but it will not be complete. The first
>> | fully-compliant gcc release is 5.1. However, it is not sufficiently
>> | stable on Windows.
>>
>> It depends. It is not black/white even if some people insist on
>> portraying it
>> as such. Many features were added incrementally.
>>
>> g++-4.6.* has C++0x with some things, g++-4.9 adds quite a lot more
>> and works
>> for all I do. At work we sometimes rely on C++14 already and use
>> g++-5.2.
>>
>> So you need to tell us what it is you want to do, or just try it, and
>> the
>> compiler _currently in use_ may fail. With some luck we may get
>> g++-4.9.* on
>> Windows with R 3.3.0.
>>
>> The error you showed from spanmatcher appeared to be a _linker_ error
>> not a
>> compiler error so something else may be going on there.
>>
>> Dirk
>>
>> --
>> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rcpp-devel mailing list
> Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
