Last post, and my sincere apologies for posting follow ups.
I reduced the C++ code to the following:
// [[Rcpp::plugins(cpp11)]]
#include <RcppCommon.h>
#include <memory>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
struct Element : public std::enable_shared_from_this< Element > {
SEXP key_;
/* Simple constructor that assigns the key. */
Element(SEXP key) : key_(key) {
PROTECT(key_);
}
~Element() {
UNPROTECT_PTR(key_);
}
/* Convert the object to a R object. */
operator SEXP() const;
};
#include <Rcpp.h>
using namespace Rcpp;
Element::operator SEXP() const
{
List serial;
serial["key"] = key_;
return serial;
}
typedef vector<shared_ptr<Element> > e_vec;
typedef XPtr<e_vec> ev_xptr;
// [[Rcpp::export]]
SEXP
initialize_storage()
{
/* Create a new storage managed by R. */
e_vec* ev = new e_vec();
ev_xptr p(ev, true);
return p;
}
// [[Rcpp::export]]
SEXP
add_element(SEXP ev_sexp, SEXP key)
{
ev_xptr ev(ev_sexp);
/* Add a new element to the internal storage. */
ev->push_back(make_shared<Element>(key));
return ev;
}
// [[Rcpp::export]]
List
get_nodes(SEXP ev_sexp)
{
ev_xptr ev(ev_sexp);
/* Allocate a List to store all our results. */
List result(ev->size());
int i = 0;
/* Iterate through the results and store the result in our list. */
for (auto it : *ev) {
result[i] = wrap(*it);
++i;
}
return result;
}
Why do I get stack imbalance warnings or what would be a better way of
protecting the SEXP members in Element and unprotecting them again when
necessary?
> On 6 Oct 2016, at 11:31, Anton Bossenbroek <anton.bossenbr...@me.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry, as a result of some iterations on my test and code an error slipped
> in. The R code should be,
>
> require(Rcpp)
> sourceCpp(file="~/tmp/example.cpp")
>
> add_children <- function(number_of_children = 2) {
> p <- 0
> st <- initialize_storage()
> for (i in 1 : number_of_children) {
> st <- add_element(st, i)
> }
> return(st)
> }
> n <- 10000
> a <- add_children(number_of_children = n)
>
> res <- sapply(get_nodes(a), function(x) x[["key"]])
> all(res == 0 : n)
>
> Since I am aware that the garbage may be trying to free up memory I added
> PROTECT(key_); in the body of the constructor of Element and
> UNPROTECT(result.size()); just before the return in get_nodes(). However,
> when I do that I get the following warning:
>
> Warning: stack imbalance in '.Call', 19 then -9981
> Warning: stack imbalance in '<-', 2 then -9998
> etc.
>
>
>
>> On 6 Oct 2016, at 10:52, Anton Bossenbroek <anton.bossenbr...@me.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I want to add a large number of objects in C++ that are managed by
>> `shared_ptr` in a `vector`. However, when I push the limits of the amount
>> that I want to allocate the data in R becomes inconsistent.
>>
>> I will first show the test script and then the c++ file that cause the
>> error. The expected results are shown at the bottom.
>>
>> # test script
>> The test script permits to add an arbitrary number of objects to a vector.
>>
>> require(Rcpp)
>> sourceCpp(file="~/tmp/example.cpp")
>>
>> add_children <- function(number_of_children = 2) {
>> p <- 0
>> st <- initialize_storage(p, p)
>> for (i in 1 : number_of_children) {
>> st <- add_node(st, i, i)
>> }
>> return(st)
>> }
>>
>> # example.cpp
>> The vector is stored in a object that is managed by R but the elements in
>> the vector are managed by `shared_ptr` and created with `make_shared`.
>>
>> // [[Rcpp::plugins(cpp11)]]
>> #include <RcppCommon.h>
>>
>> #include <memory>
>> #include <vector>
>>
>> using namespace std;
>>
>> struct Element : public std::enable_shared_from_this< Element > {
>> SEXP key_;
>>
>> /* Simple constructor that assigns the key. */
>> Element(SEXP key) : key_(key) {}
>>
>> /* Convert the object to a R object. */
>> operator SEXP() const;
>> };
>>
>> typedef shared_ptr<Element> element_sp;
>> typedef vector<element_sp> element_sp_vec;
>> typedef shared_ptr<element_sp_vec> element_sp_vec_sp;
>>
>> struct Storage {
>> /* Internal storage of nodes. */
>> element_sp_vec nodes_;
>>
>> /* Empty constructor. */
>> Storage() {}
>>
>> /* Add a node to the storage with its key set to key. */
>> void add_element(SEXP key) {
>> /* Since Element objects are managed by shared_ptr we create a new class
>> * with make_shared. */
>> element_sp e = make_shared<Element>(key);
>> /* Add the node to the internal storage. */
>> nodes_.push_back(e);
>> }
>>
>> element_sp_vec_sp get_nodes() {
>> /* Create a shared pointer that will hold all the results. Although we
>> * could do this simpler it mimics the logic I implemented in my real
>> * program. There I need to swap elements in the list after the copy of the
>> * vector. */
>> element_sp_vec_sp res(new element_sp_vec());
>> /* Copy the data in the nodes vector to the result vector. */
>> *res = nodes_;
>> return res;
>> }
>> };
>>
>> #include <Rcpp.h>
>>
>> using namespace Rcpp;
>>
>> /* Convert the Element object to a list with key set its internal member */
>> Element::operator SEXP() const
>> {
>> List serial;
>>
>> serial["key"] = key_;
>>
>> return serial;
>> }
>>
>> typedef XPtr<Storage> st_xptr;
>>
>> // [[Rcpp::export]]
>> SEXP
>> initialize_storage()
>> {
>> /* Create a new storage managed by R. */
>> Storage* st = new Storage();
>> st_xptr p(st, true);
>>
>> return p;
>> }
>>
>> // [[Rcpp::export]]
>> SEXP
>> add_element(SEXP st_sexp, SEXP key)
>> {
>> st_xptr st(st_sexp);
>> /* Add a new element to the internal storage. */
>> st->add_element(key);
>>
>> return st;
>> }
>>
>> // [[Rcpp::export]]
>> List
>> get_nodes(SEXP st_sexp)
>> {
>> st_xptr st(st_sexp);
>> /* Retrieve the elements in the internal storage. */
>> element_sp_vec_sp c_res = st->get_nodes();
>>
>> /* Allocate a List to store all our results. */
>> List result(c_res->size());
>> int i = 0;
>> /* Iterate through the results and store the result in our list. */
>> for (auto it : *c_res) {
>> result[i] = wrap(*it);
>> ++i;
>> }
>>
>> return result;
>> }
>>
>> Below follow a few test cases of the script with the behavior that I
>> experience on Mac OS Sierra with clang.
>>
>> ## n = 10
>>
>> Everything works fine
>>
>> n <- 10
>> a <- add_children(number_of_children = n)
>> res <- sapply(get_nodes(a), function(x) x[["key"]])
>> all(res == 0 : n)
>> # [1] TRUE
>>
>> ## n = 100
>>
>> Everything works fine
>>
>> n <- 100
>> a <- add_children(number_of_children = n)
>> res <- sapply(get_nodes(a), function(x) x[["key"]])
>> all(res == 0 : n)
>> # [1] TRUE
>>
>> ## n = 10000
>>
>> Something goes wrong.
>>
>> n <- 10000
>> a <- add_children(number_of_children = n)
>>
>> res <- sapply(get_nodes(a), function(x) x[["key"]])
>> all(res == 0 : n)
>> # [1] FALSE
>> # There were 50 or more warnings (use warnings() to see the first 50)
>>
>> Some further research shows that the warnings are:
>>
>> warnings()
>> # Warning messages:
>> # 1: NAs introduced by coercion
>> # 2: NAs introduced by coercion
>> # 3: NAs introduced by coercion
>> # 4: NAs introduced by coercion
>> ### etc.
>>
>> a closer inspection into the content of `res` shows that it has a non
>> numeric value,
>>
>> res[1000]
>> # [[1]]
>> # [1] "data"
>>
>> which is surprising to me since the script only added numeric `SEXP` values
>> to the `vector`. My expected output for this value of `n` would be the same
>> as the cases above.
>>
>> ## gctorture
>> I reran the `n=10000` example with `gctorture(TRUE)` but did not receive any
>> warning but the data is corrupt. Two random elements in the `res` list:
>>
>> # [[998]]
>> # <CHARSXP: "\"key\"">
>> #
>> # [[999]]
>> # [1] "srcref"
>>
>> = Replication
>> I replicated these results on Mac OS X Sierra as well as Docker image based
>> on rocker.
>>
>> sessionInfo()
>> # R version 3.3.1 (2016-06-21)
>> # Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.5.0 (64-bit)
>> # Running under: OS X 10.12 (Sierra)
>> #
>> # locale:
>> # [1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8
>> #
>> # attached base packages:
>> # [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
>> #
>> # other attached packages:
>> # [1] Rcpp_0.12.7 setwidth_1.0-4 colorout_1.1-2
>> #
>> # loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
>> # [1] tools_3.3.1
>>
>> ### uname
>>
>> uname -prsv
>> Darwin 16.0.0 Darwin Kernel Version 16.0.0: Mon Aug 29 17:56:20 PDT 2016;
>> root:xnu-3789.1.32~3/RELEASE_X86_64 i386
>>
>> ### clang
>>
>> clang -v
>> Apple LLVM version 8.0.0 (clang-800.0.38)
>> Target: x86_64-apple-darwin16.0.0
>> Thread model: posix
>> InstalledDir:
>> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin
>>
>> Any advise on what may be the problem here?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rcpp-devel mailing list
>> Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
>> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rcpp-devel mailing list
> Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
