Thanks for your useful comments, I am trying something like this in a R
file (I have changed the name of my c++ method compared with the example
above, now is called myMethodCpp in order to avoid conflicts with the R
name's function):
myClass$myMethod <- function(param1, param2 = 0L) {
invisible(.Call('myMethodCpp', PACKAGE = 'mypackage', param1, param2))
}
but when I compile the code I get the error:
objet 'myClass' not found
Do you know how can I fix it? Is there a package which does something
similar?
Thank you very much,
Sergio
2016-10-26 19:10 GMT+02:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org>:
>
> On 26 October 2016 at 10:05, Hao Ye wrote:
> | In sum, the easiest may be to 'hide' the module and deal with this
> from the
> | R
> | side exposing both variants from there and then just calling the one
> you
> | have now.
> |
> |
> | I agree - though I don't think you even need two variants of the C++
> function
> | if there's an R function to handle default arguments.
>
> Good catch, and sloppy wording on my part. This is what I meant.
>
> Dirk
>
> --
> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
>
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
