On 29 November 2016 at 21:02, Christian Gunning wrote: | [...] It can be challenging for end-users to distinguish between projects / | code that is "fully functional but no longer under active development" (ok) | from directions that code that is "unofficially deprecated".
Point taken. But it is hard to be succinct about it, but we try. We aim for - predictable releases dates (and doing well at a maintained two-months cycle) - increased tests over time, and we generally pass all existing tests ie a release does everything previous releases did, and often a bit more each time. So stuff doesn't just disappear. But we have limited time and resources and cannot expand all aspects all the time. Some stagnate. C'est la vie. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
