It didn't change anything in my testing. I wondered about wrapping the whole thing too ... but maybe that's premature? I can't tell were the slow-down is.
My ratio is around 2.4 or 2.5 with this: https://github.com/jesusfv/Comparison-Programming-Languages-Economics/compare/master...kylebmetrum:master On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 8:19 AM Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 23 September 2018 at 14:50, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > | El dom., 23 sept. 2018 14:39, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> > escribió: > | > | > > | > On 23 September 2018 at 13:01, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > | > | Also you can try adding > | > | > | > | // [[Rcpp::plugins(unwindProtect)]] > | > | > | > | to InsideLoop.cpp. That should boost the performance too with the > | > | latest version of Rcpp. > | > > | > Maybe, maybe not. Are there lots of calls happening here? Should be > easy > | > enough to add and then (micro)benchmark() from R. > | > > | > | The Rcpp function is called inside a loop, so I would expect some gain. > > True, but alternatively any one of us with a modicum of Rcpp and C++ skill > could wrap the whole subroutine so that only one call is needed. > > Dirk > > -- > http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org >
_______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
