On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 20:33, Kevin Ushey <kevinus...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think this might be worth fixing on the Rcpp side -- there should > really only be one instance of the Rcout object. Would you mind filing > an issue at https://github.com/RcppCore/Rcpp/issues, so we don't lose > track of this?
Sure, no problem. > You could of course just create your own Rcout / Rcerr objects as well > (the Rstreambuf class is public and part of the Rcpp namespace). Yeap, but that's suboptimal. I agree that this might be worth fixing on the Rcpp side. I asked first here because I'm not sure if that's possible, because packages cannot (in general) link to other packages. Iñaki _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
