On 24 October 2019 at 16:01, Serguei Sokol wrote:
| I'am trying to find a way to access class methods of one Rcpp package | (say pkgM) from C++ code in another one (say pkgA). | If it were simple C++ routines and not class methods, the way is known | and even automatized. E.g. if I generate pkgM with | | Rcpp::Rcpp.package.skeleton("pkgM", module=TRUE)
| Rcpp::compileAttributes("pkgM")
| | then in pkgM/src/RcppExports.cpp we can see | | | static const R_CallMethodDef CallEntries[] = {
|      {"_pkgM_rcpp_hello_world", (DL_FUNC) &_pkgM_rcpp_hello_world, 0},
| ...
| | As far as I understand, it registers _pkgM_rcpp_hello_world for use with | R_GetCCallable from other packages. And it is a consequence of preceding
| rcpp_hello_world() with "// [[Rcpp::export]]".
| If I add "// [[Rcpp::interfaces(r, cpp)]]" in pkgM/src/rcpp_module.cpp | it produces pkgM/inst/include/{pkgM.h,pkgM_RcppExports.h} and | | static const R_CallMethodDef CallEntries[] = {
| ...
| {"_pkgM_RcppExport_registerCCallable", (DL_FUNC) | &_pkgM_RcppExport_registerCCallable, 0},
| ...
| but still nothing for methods and functions from RCPP_MODULE.
| | So my question, what is a canonical way (if defined) to expose class | methods (via RCPP_MODULE or any other mechanism) in such a way that they | become callable from C++ code of another package? Am I supposed to | register them manually in some way using | _pkgM_RcppExport_registerCCallable()? And if so, how can I retrieve them | in C++ code of another package?

From the top of my head I would say "No" for the simple reason that all R
does (and this is the same for all other foreign-function interfaces) has to
be C based.  Hence no class methods.  C++ signatures are compiler dependent,
and have been avoided for that reason for as long as we had them.

So I fear you need plain C wrappers for every member function you want to
expose. I could of course be wrong -- if someone else has counter-examples I
would be all ears!

Dirk

--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org

I believe Dirk is correct in saying the traditional mechanism won't work for non-static member functions, but if the C++ code is fully contained in header files in 'inst/include', then it's possible to access that code from another package since there's no library that one needs to link against. I believe that's the mechanism that Rcpp itself uses.

Things get ugly when one tries to link to another package's library. I've tried a few experiments with Dirk's help (https://github.com/lsilvest/linktest), but haven't found a reliable way to make this portable (things break when packages are installed pre-compiled).

Leo
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel

Reply via email to