Here's an example program that fails to compile with gcc-10 for me: https://gist.github.com/kevinushey/cfa848be2d39ddd110f893d9b6c5ac9c
So I think we can conclude this is a gcc-10 bug. It also fails with the contracts branch of gcc on godbolt (although with a different error): https://godbolt.org/z/dowsE5 But gcc trunk seems okay. Best, Kevin On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 5:20 PM Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On 8 February 2020 at 16:59, Kevin Ushey wrote: > | It seems like a bug in gcc 10 to me. IIUC, static local variables in > | inline functions should still have internal linkage, and so name > | collisions like this should not occur. > | > | I can work around this by making sure that 'fun' is given different > | names in the RcppEigen stubs; e.g. fun1 and fun2 and so on. The fact > | that this actually works makes me think it might be a gcc bug. > > Thanks for looking, and checking. My (uneducated) guess and hunch went the > same way. > > Dirk > > -- > http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
