On 18 March 2020 at 10:48, Davis Vaughan wrote: | Here is the list of failures from my partial test. Notably (at least to | me), are dplyr and bigmemory.
Two days later. Neither one is failing at CRAN: https://cloud.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_bigmemory.html https://cloud.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_dplyr.html May still put up a bug-fix release 1.0.4-1 but I am really not too thrilled by people on social media claiming "widespread failure". I don't see it. And to be clear, the R 3.3.* issue some of you have ... is very unfortunate but also outside of our purview. We never claimed to test that far back. We invited the community to test beyond what we do -- CRAN level plus reverse depends -- but life is short and all that nobody got to it. It happens. I simply would not test on R releases older than what CRAN tests but that may just be me. I would be happy to work with a volunteer test team that wants to go beyond what CRAN mandates. Happy to support that, cannot do it myself. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
