On 3 December 2021 at 17:03, Iñaki Ucar wrote: | On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 at 15:44, Víthor Rosa <vrosafra...@gmail.com> wrote: | > | > Thank you for your response. Adding my functions to an R package and changing the Makevars file as suggested reduced the runtime by half. Excited for Rcpp 1.0.8! :) | | Excellent! Glad it helped.
I have been sitting on a branch at GitHub that defines new / easier / alternate header files as entry points. So instead of starting with Rcpp.h (possibly combined with #define statements) one could now pick exactly one off these three #include <Rcpp/Light> #include <Rcpp/Lighter> #include <Rcpp/Lightest> which turn off, respectively, Modules, RTTI and Sugar. See the commit at [1] for more and full code, it's essentially a define each and simple nesting. Each of these shaves a little bit of the compile times. (I need to rebase it to current master, it's a few months old.) But I had not yet convinced myself it would be useful / of interest. But as this thread shows, there may be interest. Any comments? Yay? Nay? (And as discussed turning UNWIND_PROTECT on globally is also a good idea but may need a proper transition, and is hence for now outside the scope of this branch.) Dirk [1] https://github.com/RcppCore/Rcpp/commit/5cf57ff663d06acf42124feae51d469f3f77be52#diff-05c80375618a46d399d73e4f32a3006aa698b9bb293a37c6d2e431a1c541b7bb -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
