Michael Clark wrote:
> I came across Little Bits (http://www.littlebits.cc/) somewhere in my 
> webdrifting and I think these are an awesome idea.

I agree.  That's one of the new generation of tinker-toy electronic 
components I've been seeing/watching.  They are building blocks for 
larger systems, requiring little integration.  As long as they keep 
innovating the components and, more importantly, keep the cost down then 
they could become a useful baseline for design.

> At work, we are moving from high priced specialty DSP's(That seem to get 
> obsoleted with out a drop in replacement about a month after the design 
> is finalized) to PIC's and AVR's. Mostly because they are cheaper. If 
> the board breaks down, they just chuck it and get a new one.

My point exactly.  Complex components "lock" you into certain approaches 
and economic ranges, simpler modular components (which also happen to be 
cheaper) give you more flexibility as a designer.  And, in the 
innovative product world, flexibility is king.

Moreover, once innovation has occurred and the product has shown value 
(like the C6C), the cheaper components make it easier to go into 
production.  Too often, designers use the biggest sledge hammer they can 
find because "it makes development easier", but then the product never 
makes it out of R&D, because production requirements (size, cost, 
performance, etc) cannot be met.  Even in the pure software business, 
too many "prototype" implementations fail to reach production status 
because the designers didn't keep the production environment and tools 
in mind when they started.

And don't think that personal, hobby components are any different. 
After you've had fun inventing and perfecting the first version, does 
anyone really want to deal with alligator clips, over-sized gear and the 
occasional "reboot required" messages whenever it is used.  No, even 
when it's your own personal widget, you still want it to deploy without 
any problems and you want to be able to afford to have a spare or two in 
the box for insurance purposes.

        Frank P.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group.
To post a message, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to