.>.. Shush. I'm a Blonde pollock, reading this at work. When I'm not
supposed to be.
The ball doesn't really have a use.
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:17, [email protected] wrote:
In a message dated 4/23/2010 9:22:28 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
Mm, my main concern would be the Legs as an Obvious weak point/easily
damaged area. Not just in combat, but marauding about. I can just see
this tripping and going over.
Ha, in WWII if they'd actually reached production, this'd be just as
effective if it fell on you! It'd be mostly unharmed, AND you'd crush
anything you hit.
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 9:15, Chrysanthos Kanellopoulos wrote:
Yeah, in my wildest sci-fi dreams I fantasize a WWI alternate reality
where this tank eventually went into production and the landscape is
flooded with these critters , in the thousands, rolling all over into
trenches and about and behind bushes like cockroaches..... Should be
spectacular.
I wanted to build one and had commnunicated the idea to George
Mastoras, some 10 years ago...
The gravity center has to be really low. This is the main problem.
Chrys
you do know your both talking about 2 different things, right? your
talking about the AT-AT walker and he's talking about the ball
Chris,
Odyssey Slipways
--
You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group.
To post a message, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
"I accuse God for the murder of eternity
My everything that is nothing
Christian propaganda and dog sperm"
--
You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group.
To post a message, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
