Challenger 1, FV4030. The one from the 80s to the 90s. The Challenger 2
might be technically superior. But I prefer the turret shaping on the
1.
On Mon, 31 May 2010 10:15, Pete Arundel wrote:
Which Challenger are we talking here? The Challenger - cruiser MkVIII
(A30), Challenger 1 (FV4030) or Challenger 2 (FV4034)?
On May 30, 11:49 pm, Patron <[email protected]> wrote:
I've decided upon a Challenger. I like the Overall form, and the tank
itself seems like much less of a pain than an Abrams. And as a Modern
equipment snob (Bolt action? Ew), it satisfies my desire for
simplicity
and my desire for something cool looking and effective.
However, I am Tempted to do a Dual build. My heart was stolen by the
Landkruzer 1500. But seeing as a 1/6th scale model would be about 23
feet long, and it only reached design status...it's not something I'd
be
able to easily field.
If it's scaled to around 1/20th it should be about 6ft. 9 inches.
Cheers,
-J
"I accuse God for the murder of eternity
My everything that is nothing
Christian propaganda and dog sperm"
--
You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group.
To post a message, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
"I accuse God for the murder of eternity
My everything that is nothing
Christian propaganda and dog sperm"
--
You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group.
To post a message, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
