I believe the reference to "IG" in the link below should be to "lG", or the more common "LG", for "Leichtgeschütz" (lightweight gun).
If the projectile is not self-propelled then a recoilless rifle or gun is an artillery piece, not a rocket launcher. A self-propelled vehicle carrying one or more rocket tubes (e.g. a Katyusha mounted on a truck) would seem to meet the definition of "Armored Car" (or should that be "Armed Car", since a Support Vehicle is "un-armed", and a truck has no armor?). If the rules are a concern (and I'm not suggesting the need be), this sounds like a plan, not a production model. I would like to see the contact explosive idea rather than the armed version - it would be interesting to see it try to get close enough without being hit twice. On Saturday, July 28, 2012 9:40:59 AM UTC-4, Aaron wrote: > > ... However, I did find a link mentioning plans for a Springer based > Kleinpanzer Wanze mounting a 105mm IG recoiless gun, but that would fall > under the rocket launcher catagory if I am not mistaken. > http://www.achtungpanzer.com/mittlere-ladungstrager-springer-sdkfz304.htm > ... > -- You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
