The curious thing about the rules on wich tank you can build or not... is that one can have a shoesbox with track ( nothing wrong with it ) and say its a Hetzer... or its a Tiger, or whatever model. but he cant say its a E-100.... I like ( but its personal ) a tank to be somehow a replica of what look the real thing.... and I like to see a wise one building a E-100 and to be fine with the rules he just have to say " its a KingTiger". Its that easy really to build a E-100 and use it in fight... if one say "but it look like a E-100"...."what cosmetic rules do you refer to?" would be enough of an answer.
my two snowflakes out of todays snowstorm. From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [TANKS] Re: The E-100 Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 14:03:38 -0500 >> I see that tank choice is really more about building what I like and >> overcoming the obstacles of getting it built more than what >> advantage/disadvantage the tank might possibly have on the field Well put, >> Mike. From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Mangus Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 2:52 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [TANKS] Re: The E-100 Think I have to respectfully disagree that they are a disadvantage. The super-heavies can be built to the 36" rule versus the 1/6th rule. That would lighten the tank considerably. That is the beauty of the rules as they stand. A person can build a tank for playbility, scaled realism, or even both. Before building my first tank, I was fretting about which tank to build that would not give me a disadvantage. After finally making a battle, I see that tank choice is really more about building what I like and overcoming the obstacles of getting it built more than what advantage/disadvantage the tank might possibly have on the field. In the end, just making a battle with my own tank was a better reward than waiting to build the "perfect" tank. As for Steve's question: in all honestly I would like to build a prototype vehicle, but realistically know that it wouldn't happen soon or even within the next few years even if protos are approved for the game. Mike From: isaac goldman <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [TANKS] Re: The E-100 ^^ Stop telling us to put our money where our mouths are :P Id like to build an E50 if the rules allowed it, but im not especially bothered they dont, and even if they did id be in no rush to start... There are two reasons imo why the super-heavy tanks are unlikely to work well in the meta-game. Firstly, same problems as real life; slow, cumbersome, big target, dont like mud and soft ground etc.Secondly, they are huge for no advantage in the game per the rules. If we added a defensive rating of 5 for tanks that were over 100 tons (not that im advocating this directly, just pointing out an option), then at least there would be some advantage to being the size of a duplex... On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 11:37 AM, TyngTech <[email protected]> wrote:These prototype questions come up every so often. I was wondering, to those lurkers (and not-so lurkers) on the list. How many of you would actually complete a combat ready tank if you could build that E-100, PL-01, or any other proto-design that's been discussed over the years? Go ahead, be honest. Steve Tyng -- -- You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to mailto:rctankcombat%[email protected] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R/C Tank Combat" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mailto:rctankcombat%[email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- Isaac Goldman 5142334423 This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. -- -- You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R/C Tank Combat" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R/C Tank Combat" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R/C Tank Combat" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R/C Tank Combat" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
