Ok. Heres my new theory then. The multi-tap shielded inductor, the variable capacitor and one tube form a Hartley oscillator.
Of course that leaves a second tube and potentiometer unaccounted for. I want to say regenerative receiver but we established its not... On 2014-03-06 1:57 PM, "Frank Pittelli" <[email protected]> wrote: > You're getting close ... in fact, one does drive the other. > > Also, in my previous hints, I said it wasn't a "radio device". I didn't > say anything about an "audio device". In loose terms, it could be > considered an audio device, but it serves other purposes that have nothing > to do with audio. > > On 3/6/2014 1:28 PM, isaac goldman wrote: > >> Now if they both do different things per the schematic does that exclude >> one driving the other? >> > > -- > -- > You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. > To post a message, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat > > --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "R/C Tank Combat" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- -- You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "R/C Tank Combat" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
