On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 2:40 PM Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 08:15:06AM +0530, Neeraj upadhyay a écrit : > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 4:15 AM Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Le Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 05:39:17PM -0400, Joel Fernandes a écrit : > > > > If srcu_invoke_callbacks() was really called for the rdp, I would have > > > > expected rcu_segcblist_advance() to advance all those pending > > > > callbacks to 304. > > > > > > > > I posit that probably srcu_invoke_callbacks() is not even being called > > > > in the first place, otherwise why is the DONE segment count still 0? > > > > DONE should not be 0, otherwise callbacks will not run. The segcblist > > > > of the rdp seems out of date perhaps due to rcu_invoke_callbacks() not > > > > being called due to some other bug (or a workqueue/timer issue causing > > > > the srcu_invoke_callbacks() to not run?). > > > > > > Speaking of, I'm looking at srcu_gp_end() and the comment after releasing > > > srcu_gp_mutex says: > > > > > > "/* A new grace period can start at this point. But only > > > one. */" > > > > > > But what ensures that? > > > > > > > I think ->srcu_cb_mutex ensures that. > > > > /* Prevent more than one additional grace period. */ > > mutex_lock(&sup->srcu_cb_mutex); > > Oh I confused ->srcu_cb_mutex with ->srcu_gp_mutex, didn't I? ;-)
Maybe :) From your reply, I thought you meant srcu_invoke_callbacks() for one GP might execute after multiple subsequent GPs have completed, which makes sense. Thanks Neeraj
