On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 08:36:51PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 16:26:26 -0800
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Currently, if a Kconfig option depends on TASKS_RCU, it conditionally does
> > "select TASKS_RCU if PREEMPTION". This works, but requires any change in
> > this enablement logic to be replicated across all such "select" clauses.
> > A new NEED_TASKS_RCU Kconfig option has been created to allow this
> > enablement logic to be in one place in kernel/rcu/Kconfig.
> >
> > Therefore, select the new NEED_TASKS_RCU Kconfig option instead of the
> > old TASKS_RCU option.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: Heiko Carstens <h...@linux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> > Cc: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
> > Cc: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.ar...@oracle.com>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rost...@goodmis.org>
Thank you! I will apply on my next rebase.
Thanx, Paul
> -- Steve
>
> > ---
> > arch/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> > index c91917b508736..154f994547632 100644
> > --- a/arch/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ config KPROBES
> > depends on MODULES
> > depends on HAVE_KPROBES
> > select KALLSYMS
> > - select TASKS_RCU if PREEMPTION
> > + select NEED_TASKS_RCU
> > help
> > Kprobes allows you to trap at almost any kernel address and
> > execute a callback function. register_kprobe() establishes
> > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ config STATIC_CALL_SELFTEST
> > config OPTPROBES
> > def_bool y
> > depends on KPROBES && HAVE_OPTPROBES
> > - select TASKS_RCU if PREEMPTION
> > + select NEED_TASKS_RCU
> >
> > config KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> > def_bool y
>
