On Mon,  1 Apr 2024 21:54:54 +0300
Nikita Kiryushin <[email protected]> wrote:

> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
> @@ -504,7 +504,8 @@ static void print_cpu_stall_info(int cpu)
>                       rcu_dynticks_in_eqs(rcu_dynticks_snap(cpu));
>       rcuc_starved = rcu_is_rcuc_kthread_starving(rdp, &j);
>       if (rcuc_starved)
> -             sprintf(buf, " rcuc=%ld jiffies(starved)", j);
> +             /* %ld is intentional, for easier bug detection */

The above still has assumptions of what is going on for the reviewer.
I would suggest something a bit more obvious like:

                /* Print signed value, as negative means it is likely a bug */


> +             snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), " rcuc=%ld jiffies(starved)", j);
>       pr_err("\t%d-%c%c%c%c: (%lu %s) idle=%04x/%ld/%#lx softirq=%u/%u 
> fqs=%ld%s%s\n",

-- Steve

Reply via email to