From: Valentin Schneider <vschn...@redhat.com>
The context_tracking.state RCU_DYNTICKS subvariable has been renamed to
RCU_WATCHING, reflect that change in the related helpers.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschn...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frede...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadh...@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 68eca7d3fdd1..47ec9f2daaed 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -283,16 +283,16 @@ void rcu_softirq_qs(void)
}
/*
- * Reset the current CPU's ->dynticks counter to indicate that the
+ * Reset the current CPU's RCU_WATCHING counter to indicate that the
* newly onlined CPU is no longer in an extended quiescent state.
* This will either leave the counter unchanged, or increment it
* to the next non-quiescent value.
*
* The non-atomic test/increment sequence works because the upper bits
- * of the ->dynticks counter are manipulated only by the corresponding CPU,
+ * of the ->state variable are manipulated only by the corresponding CPU,
* or when the corresponding CPU is offline.
*/
-static void rcu_dynticks_eqs_online(void)
+static void rcu_watching_online(void)
{
if (ct_rcu_watching() & CT_RCU_WATCHING)
return;
@@ -5058,7 +5058,7 @@ void rcutree_report_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
rnp = rdp->mynode;
mask = rdp->grpmask;
arch_spin_lock(&rcu_state.ofl_lock);
- rcu_dynticks_eqs_online();
+ rcu_watching_online();
raw_spin_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_lock);
raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp);
WRITE_ONCE(rnp->qsmaskinitnext, rnp->qsmaskinitnext | mask);
--
2.40.1
