Mac said:

> [snip]Present graduates should 
> know AACR2.  But they should also be aware of possible coming change.

I don't know about the current and near-future grads, but I can tell you
that it is getting harder and harder to get the current practicing
catalogers to come to AACR continuing ed. I keep hearing that it is not that
they do not want to come, but that their administrators do not want to send
them.

This is for a variety of reasons, including the "good enough" philosophy
that they (Admin folks) are increasingly buying into; but I also believe it
is because they are asking why their existing staff should learn 'old' rules
at this late stage, when new 'rules' are coming.

> I suppose RDA is too verbose for you to come out with an RDA 
> version of your handy dandy binder?  I know of nothing more 
> helpful to the new cataloguer trying to use multiple 
> standards simultaneously.

Thank you for the kind words, but I am still undecided about whether I will
be doing an updated version of "Cataloging with AACR2 and MARC21" as
"Cataloging with RDA and MARC21". 

I hope I will not have to, because I would far rather see a software
solution that would allow catalogers to enter RDA data elements in a nicely
designed form (NOT a raw XML document) and have MARC21 records created
magically--ISBD punctuation, order of data, links to Registry terms and all;
with options for turning off the things you don't want carried over into
your M21 records. 

With all of that stuff handled by software (that we can trust), we will then
be able to turn our minds to explaining and teaching the RDA approach to
bibliographic information, especially its increased emphasis on discovering
and indicating relationships between things.

So far, I am still not hearing that these data entry forms are going to be
made available from any of the 'official' sites.

Deborah

------
Deborah Fritz
MARC Database Consultant
The MARC of Quality
www.marcofquality.com
Voice/Fax: (321) 676-1904
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 4262 (20090720) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 

Reply via email to