Thank you Mark for being your usual helpful self. I see no logic for 1XX/7XX$e to be last, but 7XX$i to the first. I find it strange that LCPS calls for omitting 1XX/7XX$e, but including 7XX$i, They seem analogous to me, indicating the relation of the entry to the title being described.
In both cases, it seems better to me to have the entry justified in the description, than to have the relationship designator, which could complicate indexing. Does RDA use any other term for $i which differs from the term for $e? __ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod ([email protected]) {__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/ ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
