Brenndorfer, Thomas wrote: 
<snip>
What is the economic advantage to actually recording the data, but not using it 
in a more modern way? The effort is already spent in recording, by someone, 
somewhere, but not necessarily in linking. If the only display option in the 
past was the card catalogue, it's not much of a leap in understanding why some 
fields weren't used, but yet the data was still recorded.

Or, to put it another way, as institutions cast an eye on other systems, such 
as IMDB, that seem to be doing a fantastic job, how can one argue that 
libraries can't be doing the same level of quality work-- cost-effectively!--, 
especially in a collaborative environment, where better tools and mechanisms 
(and standards!) are regularly appearing?
</snip>

There is still another way of looking at it, today in a modern way, and that is 
to actually *cooperate* with other communities such as IMDB. In the broad 
scheme of things, if we were going to add relator information for materials 
that are already in IMDB, which you say is so great and I am sure you are 
correct, this is duplicated effort. That makes no sense today. So, instead of 
looking at it as a "competition" we should be looking at opportunities for real 
and genuine cooperation--in fact, we absolutely *must* be looking at such 
opportunities. There are a myriad of such possibilities today, and it will mean 
genuine change for us, as well as for others.

In the current information/economic/budgetary environment, I still believe that 
for a general cataloger to spend substantially more time cataloging each item 
is impracticable. Productivity must increase; and increase a lot. For specific 
communities, it may be a different matter. 

I certainly hope that Michael Gorman's talk from the RDA@yourlibrary conference 
is made generally available: The Path Not Taken: A Descriptive Cataloging 
"might have been" where he discusses some of these matters. We spoke at the 
same time, and I only heard him after the fact, but his thoughts are very 
important and all need to consider them.

James L. Weinheimer  [email protected]
Director of Library and Information Services
The American University of Rome
Rome, Italy
First Thus: http://catalogingmatters.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to