Billie Hackney wrote:

But it doesn't change the fact that creating an RDA record is more work, more 
typing, and more effort for overworked catalogers.

---------------------------------------------------------

This is not an invalid criticism of RDA, and an area where early criticisms 
felt that RDA did not go far enough in evolving from its AARC2 roots.  The 
language of RECORDING element data in AACR2 was largely carried forward intact 
in RDA.  In places where we are to transcribe information directly from the 
resource, this is fine.  In many other places, it would be sufficient to 
INDICATE element data.  

As a particular example, describing the extent and nature of content.  The 
arguments over abbreviating vs. not abbreviating is an unfortunate outcome of 
maintaining this RECORDING mindset.  The further dithering over the creation of 
new MARC fields to translated the recorded data into corresponding coded data 
is another by-product.  

Is it really necessary to require a cataloger to record in a digital context 
the actual words "illustrations" or "colour/color" or "black and white"?  (And 
then duplicate those details with codes elsewhere?)  Should it not be 
sufficient to have interfaces on the cataloging and the public display modes 
that allow one to draft a record with "ill." "col." or "b&w", or corresponding 
coded values, or options from a drop-down menu, which are then converted when 
stored into an appropriate stored value and when displayed into the 
corresponding (and even language/script appropriate) text?  (And at the risk of 
overgeneralizing and of drawing commonalities where few believe they exist, 
this seems to be the crux of many of the disagreements between the "pro" and 
"anti" RDA crowds -- they both see a problem but have widely divergent takes on 
the solutions -- change the way we deal with the data in the context of RDA or 
reject the changes RDA institutes outright.)

So now, instead of moving forward by experimenting with different solutions to 
input/storage/display, we instead can't get past the point of thousands of 
catalogers having to type out "illustrations" "colour/color" "black and white" 
etc., because that's the only option RDA gives us.

John F. Myers, Catalog Librarian
Schaffer Library, Union College
807 Union St.
Schenectady NY 12308

518-388-6623
mye...@union.edu

Reply via email to