Freta said:
>
>The LC-PCC-PS was recently updated to indicate that the requirement was to =
>infer the date of publication from the copyright date and bracket it, but i=
>t no longer says to record the copyright date. Therefore, following this p=
>ractice, one would have a bracketed date in the 264 1, but not record a 264=
> 3 with the copyright date.
Field 264 3 $a$b$c is manufacturer. Copyright date is 264 4 $c.
We find the same date twice (264 1 and 264 4, Date 2 and Date 2) to
be redundant and confusing, so are please with the policy decision to
omit 264 4 $c if the same year as 264 1 $c, and to omit Date 2 if
the same as Date one, and code "s".
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
