This is applicable to all art or arts, music included. See CCQ, vol. 50 (or 51?) nos. 5-8.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Joan Wang <jw...@illinoisheartland.org>wrote: > I agree with Sara. Honestly, I think about the question the whole morning. > Finally I feel that a photography of an original artistic work should be a > new work and expression. I did a hesitation on " a new work". But it is > very hard to say that photographing is not an individual artistic content > creation. Any more thoughts? > > Thanks, > Joan Wang > Illinois Heartland Library System > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Elizabeth O'Keefe > <eoke...@themorgan.org>wrote: > >> Several months ago, there was a discussion on the PCCList about whether >> it was appropriate to add an access point for: >> >> [Artist]. Works. Selections >> >> to a printed monograph that includes reproductions of the artist's >> work. The use of conventional collective titles is well-established for >> compilations of textual works, but prior to RDA, headings of this kind >> were never applied to monographs illustrated with reproductions of art >> works. Catalogers of art-related materials felt the headings were >> confusing and unhelpful. >> >> The Cataloging Advisory Committee of ARLIS has held several discussions >> about this topic, and is considering, among other issues, the FRBR >> justification for the practice. We are uncertain about how FRBR would >> characterize the relationship between an art work and a reproduction of >> that work, and would welcome comments from readers of this list on >> questions such as: >> >> Is a reproduction an expression of the art work? A manifestation of the >> art work? Or is it an expression or manifestation of a different work >> that is related to the art work? If the reproduction is in turn >> reproduced in another medium, such as a printed monograph, what is the >> relationship between the art work, the photographic reproduction of that >> art work, and the photomechanical reproduction of that reproduction >> presented in the printed work? And is the FRBR relationship affected by >> the content type--in other words, will the FRBR relationships for a >> reproduction of a photograph of a drawing be different from the FRBR >> relationships for a reproduction of a photograph of a three-dimensional >> object? >> >> Any thoughts you choose to share on this vexing topic will be much >> appreciated. >> >> Liz O'Keefe >> >> >> >> Elizabeth O'Keefe >> Director of Collection Information Systems >> The Morgan Library & Museum >> 225 Madison Avenue >> New York, NY 10016-3405 >> >> TEL: 212 590-0380 >> FAX: 212-768-5680 >> NET: eoke...@themorgan.org >> >> Visit CORSAIR, the Library’s comprehensive collections catalog, now >> on >> the web at >> http://corsair.themorgan.org >> > > > > -- > Zhonghong (Joan) Wang, Ph.D. > Cataloger -- CMC > Illinois Heartland Library System (Edwardsville Office) > 6725 Goshen Road > Edwardsville, IL 62025 > 618.656.3216x409 > 618.656.9401Fax > -- Gene Fieg Cataloger/Serials Librarian Claremont School of Theology gf...@cst.edu Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Lincoln University do not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information or content contained in this forwarded email. The forwarded email is that of the original sender and does not represent the views of Claremont School of Theology or Claremont Lincoln University. It has been forwarded as a courtesy for information only.
