Just a note here: 504 is not a quoted note, but one that is constructed: Includes bibliographical references ()
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Dana Van Meter <vanme...@ias.edu> wrote: > Thanks everyone. I did see rule 1.7.1 at some point in my RDA travels, > and then forgot about it. I agree that it probably should apply in the > case of the 504. I hate that cataloging in RDA feels like assembling a > puzzle every single time. I wish that one didn’t have to jump to all over > the place to find out how one thing should be done. **** > > ** ** > > Thanks again.**** > > ** ** > > -Dana**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access > [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] *On Behalf Of *Cronquist, Michelle J > *Sent:* Friday, April 12, 2013 3:21 PM > *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > *Subject:* Re: [RDA-L] Unnumbered page in a 504 note**** > > ** ** > > You’d omit the brackets, according to LC-PSS 1.7.1, which says “Do not use > square brackets in notes except when they are used in quoted data,” and > gives this example:**** > > ** ** > > 500 <http://desktop.loc.gov/saved/Mabibl_500> ##**** > > $a"Types of prayer wheels found in south central Tibet, by Mei Lin": pages > 310-375.**** > > Not "... pages [310]-[375]."**** > > ** ** > > ---**** > > Michelle Cronquist**** > > North Caroliniana Cataloger**** > > Special Collections Technical Services**** > > CB#3926, Wilson Library**** > > University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill**** > > ** ** > > 919-962-6901**** > > 919-962-3594 (fax)**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access > [mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA <RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>] *On > Behalf Of *Dana Van Meter > *Sent:* Friday, April 12, 2013 2:57 PM > *To:* RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA > *Subject:* [RDA-L] Unnumbered page in a 504 note**** > > ** ** > > Hello. I’ve rooted around RDA several times trying to find an answer to > this question and I can’t find one anywhere. Is there any direction > anywhere in RDA or in the policy statements that tell you what to do when > you are noting that bibliographical references are present and are noting > the page numbers the references fall on, and where either the starting or > ending (though usually the starting) page is not numbered in the book > itself. In AACR2 we would put the correct page number inside square > brackets. In most of the cases of this situation I’ve seen in the RDA > copy that’s out there, I see people just citing the page number without the > square brackets. I’ve only seen someone use square brackets once or > twice. The AACR2 in me hates to put the page number without the square > bracket when the page is not numbered in the book itself, which is > generally the case with most of the books I catalog, as the heading > Bibliography (or Bibliographical References, or whatever the case may be) > usually > appears a bit lower down on the page, and thus the page number is usually > skipped on the starting page for the bibliographical references. I’ve > looked at rule 7.16.1.3 and the LC-PCC PS for 7.16.1.3 and neither mentions > what to do in a bibliographical references note when the starting (or > ending) page is not numbered in the book itself.**** > > Is this mentioned anywhere in RDA, or in an LC-PCC PS? If it’s not, can > someone from LC monitoring this list please add this to the LC-PCC PS for > 7.16.1.3 so I don’t have to hem and haw every time I encounter this > situation?**** > > Thanks very much for your help,**** > > Dana Van Meter**** > > Cataloging Librarian**** > > Historical Studies-Social Science Library**** > > Institute for Advanced Study**** > > Princeton, NJ 08540**** > > vanme...@ias.edu**** > -- Gene Fieg Cataloger/Serials Librarian Claremont School of Theology gf...@cst.edu Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Lincoln University do not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information or content contained in this forwarded email. The forwarded email is that of the original sender and does not represent the views of Claremont School of Theology or Claremont Lincoln University. It has been forwarded as a courtesy for information only.
