Some time ago, I pointed out to PSD that the example in the Appendix you
cite is not in line with the example elsewhere in LC-PCC PS 6.27.3:
700 12 $a Macken, JoAnn Early, $d 1953- $t Mail carrier.
700 12 $a Macken, JoAnn Early, $d 1953- $t Mail carrier. $l Spanish.
It looks like they haven't reconciled these two examples.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adam L. Schiff
Principal Cataloger
University of Washington Libraries
Box 352900
Seattle, WA 98195-2900
(206) 543-8409
(206) 685-8782 fax
asch...@u.washington.edu
http://faculty.washington.edu/~aschiff
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Wed, 15 May 2013, Jennifer W. Baxmeyer wrote:
Hi everyone,
RDA 6.27.1.9 states:
Make additions to access points if needed to distinguish the access point for a
work:
from one that is the same or similar but represents a different work or from
one that represents a person, family, corporate body, or place.
The LC PCC-PS for 6.27.1.9 shows the following:
Appendix 1: Motion Pictures, Television Programs, Radio Programs
Example 5. Subtitled motion picture released under the same or a different
title. Construct an authorized access point for a subtitled motion picture
released under the same or a different title:
245 00 Seven samurai ...
730 02 Shichinin no samurai. ?l English.
730 02 Shichinin no samurai . ?l Japanese.
My questions are:
1. Why is $l Japanese needed for the second 730 field since this is
the original language of the work?
2. Why do we follow this practice with motion pictures but not with
printed monographs? We wouldn?t include $l with the original language...
Thank you!
--
Jennifer W. Baxmeyer
Leader, Serials and E-Resources Team
Princeton University Library
Technical Services Department
Cataloging and Metadata Services
693 Alexander Road
Princeton NJ 08540
b...@princeton.edu<mailto:b...@princeton.edu>
609.258.3631 phone
609.258.9363 fax
