Just a question here. How would this affect authority work when one is trying establish usage?
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Bernadette Mary O'Reilly < bernadette.orei...@bodleian.ox.ac.uk> wrote: > Hello**** > > ** ** > > RDA gives an order of preferred sources of information for statements of > responsibility. Is this order to be invoked only if essentially the same > statements of responsibility (i.e., with the same information) are found on > more than one source? Or does it mean that **** > > if you take statements from one source you should not also take quite > different statements from another?**** > > ** ** > > In a MARC context: if editor-of-compilation is mentioned on title page, > contributors a little further in, translator on colophon and illustrator on > publisher’s website, should all these statements (assuming they are all > wanted) go in 245 $c? My own preference would be to give all statements > other than the one from the preferred source as quoted notes, because > stringing them all together might well interfere with identification. > However, this approach does not seem to be justified by the definition of > “note on statement of responsibility” [2.20.3].**** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > Bernadette**** > > ******************* > Bernadette O'Reilly > Catalogue Support Librarian **** > > 01865 2-77134 **** > > Bodleian Libraries, > Osney One Building > Osney Mead > Oxford OX2 0EW.**** > > ******************* **** > > ** ** > -- Gene Fieg Cataloger/Serials Librarian Claremont School of Theology gf...@cst.edu Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Lincoln University do not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information or content contained in this forwarded email. The forwarded email is that of the original sender and does not represent the views of Claremont School of Theology or Claremont Lincoln University. It has been forwarded as a courtesy for information only.
