Should have said: "hold down the ALT key and type 0169 on the number pad ".

Benjamin Abrahamse
Cataloging Coordinator
Acquisitions, Metadata and Enterprise Systems
MIT Libraries
617-253-7137

From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Benjamin A Abrahamse
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 3:09 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] another (basic) 264 query

According to RDA 2.11 "Copyright date", record "date associated with a claim of 
protection under copyright or a similar regime".  RDA says nothing about 
recording who actually holds the copyright, so, no, you wouldn't do that.

Also you can use either "copyright" or "(c)".  On a Windows machine, a quick 
shortcut to produce the (c) symbol is to hold down the ALT key and type 0169 
(doesn't work with the numbers above the letters).

b

Benjamin Abrahamse
Cataloging Coordinator
Acquisitions, Metadata and Enterprise Systems
MIT Libraries
617-253-7137

From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca] On Behalf Of Karen Nelson
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:35 PM
To: RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca<mailto:RDA-L@listserv.lac-bac.gc.ca>
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] another (basic) 264 query

What Dana has just posted is very helpful (great timing!) and I have just 
noticed that Mac answered a very similar one from me last time I was fiddling 
with some RDA bibs. Should've checked my saved replies, note to self.

But I am still wondering about the issue of the author holding copyright ... 
does her name go in the second 264, if a second one is kept? Haven't seen it 
done so far.

Karen

From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access 
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Karen Nelson
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 10:33 AM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA<mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA>
Subject: [RDA-L] another (basic) 264 query

I am just getting my toes wet with some RDA copy cataloguing based on LC bibs.

Looking at the bib for Louise Erdrich's Round House, LCCN 2012005381.
There is a 260 in this one still. I want to edit it to 264(s). So far, I have 
included:

264_1|aNew York, NY :|bHarper,|c[2012]      or maybe [2012?]
264_4 |ccopyright 2012


My queries:
Since the author is identified on the tp verso as copyright holder, do I 
include her in the second (copyright) 264? I don't think I have seen that done, 
but does not to do so imply that Harper has the copyright?

Should the square-bracketed inferred date in the first 264 have a question 
mark, or not. LC had it in 260 without copyright symbol. Haven't checked the 
publisher's website yet.

This level of question will give someone a laugh, if nothing else.

Karen

Reply via email to